Artificial intelligence (AI) has been causing quite a stir in the arts community lately. Some say that these AI apps are revolutionizing the way we create and consume art, while others argue that they are nothing more than a cheap gimmick and a threat to traditional art forms.

One camp argues that AI is making it easier for artists to generate new ideas and bring their creations to life. With the help of these apps, artists can quickly and easily generate endless variations of their work, allowing them to experiment and explore new creative possibilities.

However, there are those who see AI as a threat to the very essence of art. They argue that these apps are simply churning out formulaic and unoriginal works, and that they are taking away from the human element that makes art so special.

But perhaps the biggest controversy surrounding AI in the arts is the question of who gets to take credit for the work. Some argue that the AI app is the true creator, while others say that the artist who programmed the app should be credited.

Regardless of which side of the debate you fall on, one thing is clear: AI is here to stay in the arts community, and it’s up to each individual artist to decide how they want to use it. Some will embrace it as a tool to enhance their work, while others will shun it as a threat to their craft.

In the end, it’s up to the audience to decide which side they agree with. Will they embrace the new and exciting possibilities offered by AI, or will they stick with traditional art forms that have stood the test of time? Only time will tell.